Blog
Why LNG still drives peak power prices across South-East Europe
For investors tracking South-East Europe’s power market, the key risk factor is not renewable build-out alone—it is how LNG pricing and gas-fired dispatch translate into marginal electricity prices. Even as solar and wind expand, the system’s clearing price during peak hours continues to be shaped by gas plants, with knock-on effects across multiple national markets through cross-border trading.
Electricity pricing in South-East Europe is ultimately anchored not in renewables or coal, but in gas. More precisely, it is anchored in liquefied natural gas and the infrastructure that brings it into the region. While renewable capacity is expanding rapidly and coal remains part of the system, the marginal price—the price that clears the market during peak hours—is increasingly set by gas-fired generation, particularly in Greece and, through interconnection, across the broader Balkan system.
Gas-to-power transmission: where price signals travel
This linkage between fuel costs and power pricing is structural rather than temporary. It defines the price floor, volatility range and upside scenarios across major electricity markets in the region—Greece (HEnEx), Bulgaria (IBEX), Romania (OPCOM), Hungary (HUPX)—and indirectly affects Serbia, which remains outside full market coupling but stays exposed through cross-border flows.
The mechanics start with Greece’s LNG import capability. The Revithoussa terminal, with capacity of approximately 7 bcm per year, has long been a primary entry point for LNG into the Greek system. Its expansion and operational optimisation have increased flexibility so supply can respond more quickly to changing market conditions.
A second facility adds scale and redundancy: Alexandroupolis FSRU, with capacity of 5.5 bcm per year. Together, these assets effectively double Greece’s ability to import LNG and strengthen its position as a regional gas hub.
LNG benchmarks feed generation costs—and then wholesale prices
LNG delivered into Greece is priced against global benchmarks. Those benchmarks are primarily influenced by Asian demand, European storage levels and geopolitical supply dynamics. Delivered gas costs typically translate into power generation costs of €70–120/MWh, depending on plant efficiency—typically 50–60% for combined-cycle gas turbines—and carbon costs under the EU ETS.
With carbon prices in the range of €70–90 per tonne CO₂, gas-fired generation faces structurally higher cost levels than historical norms. In practice, this means that when renewables do not cover demand or when consumption peaks, gas becomes the marginal layer that sets day-ahead clearing prices.
Marginal setting shows up differently across national markets
The effect is visible in Greece first. Gas plants operated by companies such as PPC, Mytilineos and Motor Oil form the marginal generation layer when they are needed most. During those periods, Greek wholesale electricity prices have averaged €100–140/MWh, with spikes above €200/MWh during tight supply or elevated gas-price conditions.
Bulgaria illustrates how interconnection transmits those signals northward. The Bulgaria–Greece interconnection, with capacity of 1,200–1,500 MW and annual flows exceeding 10–12 TWh, moves electricity based on relative pricing between systems. When Greek prices rise sharply, electricity tends to flow from Bulgaria into Greece—raising Bulgarian prices as local supply is redirected. When Greek prices fall—often linked to solar oversupply—flows reverse direction and export surplus electricity northward while depressing neighbouring market prices.
This bidirectional interaction creates alignment at peak times even though Bulgaria’s generation mix includes nuclear (Kozloduy NPP, ~2 GW), coal (the Maritsa East complex) and renewables. Day-ahead prices in Bulgaria can reach €120–160/MWh during peak periods even when domestic generation costs are lower.
Romania shows a more diversified pattern because hydro output alongside nuclear (Cernavodă NPP, ~1.4 GW) reduces reliance on any single fuel source most of the time. Still, when demand rises or hydro output falls low enough for scarcity conditions to emerge, Romanian gas plants become marginal again—pulling Romanian day-ahead pricing toward broader regional levels. Average Romanian prices typically range between €80–110/MWh, but convergence occurs when interconnection capacity allows full utilisation across borders.
Serbia remains outside full market coupling yet does not sit apart from these dynamics. Through links such as (as described) (a) (as described) (a) (as described)
The Serbia–Hungary and Serbia–Bulgaria interconnections transmit price signals into Serbia’s market environment where domestic generation—largely coal-based via EPS fleet—sets a baseline but cannot isolate pricing from regional stress events. During those episodes Serbian prices align with neighbouring markets due to import dependency and cross-border arbitrage.
A merit order built on renewables at zero cost—but priced by gas at peaks
The region’s merit order increasingly reflects a two-part structure: renewables displace higher-cost units when available because they enter at near-zero marginal cost; however, when solar or wind output declines or demand surges beyond what renewables can cover, gas plants are called upon to meet residual load—and then set the price for everyone in that clearing interval.
This design produces pronounced intraday volatility. In Greece during midday periods of high solar output, prices can fall to €30–50/MWh, sometimes approaching zero when surplus cannot be exported due to limited interconnection capacity. As solar output fades later in the day and dispatch shifts back toward thermal units—including gas—prices move back toward roughly €100–150/MWh. The resulting intraday spread often sits around €60–100/MWh.
Sponsors face volatility risk—but storage turns it into value creation
This volatility cuts both ways for renewable developers: high peak prices raise potential revenues during scarcity intervals but concentration of solar production around low-price periods can reduce capture rates if projects do not hedge timing risk. Without mitigation measures such as shifting output profiles or securing contracts aligned with peak value windows, solar projects may realise average prices €10–25/MWh below baseload benchmarks..
Batteries monetise spreads created by LNG-linked dispatch economics
Storage integration emerges as one primary mechanism for capturing value from this structure.
The idea is straightforward: shift energy from low-price periods into higher-price hours so batteries effectively arbitrage against the same signal that makes gas expensive at peaks. A 200 MWh battery system operating in Greece can capture spreads of €50–80/MWh**, generating annual revenues of €15–30 million**, depending on utilisation**. This changes volatility from an exposure into a revenue stream capable of supporting equity IRRs of %12&ndash%18%.’
PPA hedging adds another layer beneath spot-market pricing pressure
The structure also interacts with industrial demand management. (as described) Enegry-intensive industries exposed to carbon costs are increasingly seeking hedges against gas-driven price swings through long-term renewable contracts. PPA terms priced at €65&ndash%95/MWh provide a stable alternative to spot exposure**, decoupling part of industrial consumption from spot outcomes tied to marginal generation. This creates a parallel pricing layer within the market anchored in renewable supply rather than marginal dispatch economics.’
Lenders look for downside resilience as global fuel dynamics dominate assumptions
From a financing perspective, (as described) a strong case exists for both upside potential and caution about downside risk. </emHigh gas-price environments support higher electricity-price assumptions, </emimproving revenue expectations under base-case or upside scenarios. </emBut lenders remain focused on downside resilience rather than relying solely on optimistic commodity outcomes. </emFinancial models typically assume conservative price scenarios in the €&rsquo70&ndash90/MWh range**, paired with sensitivity analyses that incorporate higher-price environments. This approach reflects recognition that both LNG costs—and therefore power clearing levels—are driven by global factors beyond regional control.’
Tighter grids can smooth extremes without removing gas’s role at peaks</h2</div
<pTransmission investment matters because it moderates how strongly one country’s marginal conditions spill over into others. </emProjects including The Trans-Balkan Corridor (€&rsquo300&ndash400 million)** along with Greece–Bulgaria reinforcements (**00 million+**) increase cross-border transfer capability. </emThat should help smooth differences between national pricing regimes while reducing extreme volatility caused by congestion constraints. </emStill, </emwhen generation mixes remain divergent and interconnection capacity remains finite, </emgas will continue defining marginal price formation across large parts of South-East Europe.’
Differentiating opportunity requires tracking correlations between LNG benchmarks and power flows</h2</div
A growing number of participants use data platforms such as Electricity.Trade** to monitor how LNG benchmark movements connect to day-ahead power outcomes via cross-border flows.* By analysing correlations between fuel indices, </emday-ahead pricing patterns, </emand congestion behaviour, </emmarket participants aim to anticipate directional moves more effectively—and adjust strategies accordingly.* This matters because it links operational decisions directly back to global commodity drivers rather than treating power markets as self-contained systems.* ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ”.replace(”,”)
'’
”
”
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘